Table 2.
Mathematical models for conjugated diene content, total polar material content, polymer triglyceride content, viscosity and color values of oil samples taken after 50th frying
| Models | Equationsa | P values | Adequate precision | Determination coefficient (R2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Lack of fit | ||||
| Model 1 | CD (%) = −0.67 + 6.72 × 10−3A − 0.29B + 0.48C + 1.97 × 10−3AB – 1.1 × 10−3AC − 0.02BC -0.03C2 | < 0.0001* | 0.1666 | 16.369 | 0.9331 |
| Model 2 | TPM (%) = 8.11 − 0.03A − 7.24B − 1.38C + 0.05AB + 7.5 × 10−3AC − 0.68B2 + 0.13C2 | 0.0005* | 0.9593 | 13.061 | 0.8451 |
| Model 3 | Polymer TAG (%) = −54.53 + 0.61A − 1.97B − 0.07C + 0.01AB + 9.77 × 10−3AC − 1.58 × 10−3A2 − 0.16C2 | < 0.0001* | 0.7303 | 17.363 | 0.9196 |
| Model 4 | Viscosity (cP) = + 27.00 + 0.12A − 3.86B + 3.56C + 0.03AB − 0.016AC−0.21BC | < 0.0001* | 0.6105 | 19.656 | 0.9199 |
| Model 5 | L* = -134.32 + 2.26A + 5.65B – 1.59C – 0.03AB -0.25BC −6.55 × 10−3A2 + 0.20C2 | 0.0001* | 0.9537 | 18.273 | 0.9276 |
| Model 6 | a* = + 182.46 − 2.24A − 0.52B −1.76C − 7.09 × 10−3AB + 0.02AC + 6.67*10−3A2 + 0.65B2 − 0.12C2 | < 0.0001* | 0.2227 | 19.749 | 0.9654 |
| Model 7 | b* = + 65.00 − 0.59A − 3.30B + 0.88C + 0.30BC + 2.34 × 10−3A2 | < 0.0001* | 0.4874 | 21.611 | 0.9076 |
*Statistically significant at a significant level (α) of 0.05
aLetters A, B, C indicate frying temperature (°C), dough salt content (%) and frying time (min), respectively
CD, conjugated diene value, TPM, total polar material, TAG, triglyceride