Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;25:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.004

Table 1.

Study charcteristics & patient demographics.

Author LOE PRP N PRP Female (%) Age ± SD (Yrs) Control N Control Female (%) Age ± SD (Yrs) F/U (Mo) Risk of Bias
Atwa et al., 2018 II PRP 18 16 (88.9%) 38.5 ± 8.0 CS 18 16 (88.9%) 36.6 ± 8.8 3 High
Güven et al., 2019 II PRP & Splint 20 N/R 47.5 Splint 20 N/R 50 1 High
Malahias et al., 2018 I PRP US 26 N/R 60.5 ± 14.4 NS 24 N/R 57.2 ± 16.1 3 Low
Raeissadat et al., 2018 I PRP & Splint 21 21 (100%) 51.2 ± 9.8 Splint 20 20 (100%) 47.2 ± 7.1 3 High
Senna et al., 2019 I PRP US 43 35 (81.4%) 38.3 ± 6.4 CS US 42 36 (85.7%) 40.7 ± 9.4 3 Moderate
Shen et al., 2019 I PRP US 26 25 (96.2%) 56.8 ± 1.7 Dex 26 22 (82.6%) 58.5 ± 2.1 6 High
Uzun et al., 2017 II PRP 20 16 (80%) 48.8 ± 5.8 CS 20 16 (80%) 48.5 ± 6.1 6 High
Wu et al., 2017 I PRP US 30 27 (90%) 57.9 ± 1.5 Splint 30 25 (83.3%) 54.3 ± 1.3 6 High

CS; Corticosteroid, Dex; Dextrose, F/U; Follow-Up, Mo; Months, N; Number, NS; Normal Saline, PRP; Platelet Rich Plasma, SD; Standard deviation, Yrs; Years.