Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;22(1):179–187. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03584

Table 1. Unbinding Energy Landscape Parameters of the Anticalin:CTLA-4 Complex under Different Pulling Geometries.

anchor point on anticalin log(k0) (DHS) log(k0) (BE) Δx [nm] (DHS) Δx [nm] (BE) ΔG [kBT] (DHS)
1 –3.0 ± 0.2 –3.1 ± 0.3 0.50 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.03 16.8 ± 0.6
21 –4.2 ± 0.5 –4 ± 3 0.63 ± 0.09 0.4 ± 0.2 18 ± 1
55 –2.0 ± 0.3 –2.4 ± 0.3 0.27 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.02 13.9 ± 0.9
60 –2.7 ± 0.2 –4.7 ± 0.2 0.25 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.01 17 ± 1
87 –3.7 ± 0.3 –6.0 ± 0.6 0.38 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.03 17.8 ± 0.4
116 –4.0 ± 0.1 –5 ± 1 0.57 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.07 17.2 ± 0.2
143 –4.4 ± 0.6 –3 ± 1 1.0 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 18 ± 1
178 –3.8 ± 0.6 –1.6 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.1 0.36 ± 0.04 17 ± 1