TABLE 4.

Direct effects.

Hypotheses	Statistical paths	Beta	2.5%	97.5%	P values	T statistics	Conclusion
H1a	AS → EVH	0.312	0.129	0.500	0.001	0.312	Supported
H1b	AS → PLD	0.468	0.303	0.643	0.000	0.468	Supported
H1c	AS → RAH	0.376	0.210	0.549	0.000	0.376	Supported

AS, Abusive Supervision; EVH, Evasive Hiding; PLD, Playing Dumb; RAH, Rationalized Hiding.