TABLE 5.
Direct effects |
Indirect effects |
Total effects |
|||||
Indirect path | B | t | β | t | B | T | Conclusion |
AS -> PCB -> EVH | 0.312 | 3.279 | 0.231 | 3.103 | 0.542 | 8.613 | Partial Mediation |
BCI LL | 0.129 | 0.090 | 0.422 | ||||
BCI UL | 0.500 | 0.379 | 0.664 | ||||
AS -> PCB -> PLD | 0.468 | 5.320 | 0.235 | 3.967 | 0.703 | 15.115 | Partial Mediation |
BCI LL | 0.303 | 0.120 | 0.613 | ||||
BCI UL | 0.643 | 0.353 | 0.794 | ||||
AS -> PCB -> RAH | 0.376 | 4.374 | 0.270 | 4.270 | 0.646 | 13.540 | Partial Mediation |
BCI LL | 0.210 | 0.148 | 0.554 | ||||
BCI UL | 0.549 | 0.395 | 0.738 |
AS, Abusive Supervision; PCB, Psychological Contract Breach; EVH, Evasive Hiding; PLD, Playing Dumb; RAH, Rationalized Hiding; BCI LL, Bootstrapped Confidence Interval Lower level; BCI UL, Bootstrapped Confidence Interval Upper level.