8.1. Analysis.
Comparison 8: CFOs versus shoes in DCD flat feet, Outcome 1: Gait parameters
Gait parameters | ||||
Study | Median | IQR | significance | group (N) |
six minute walk test (6MWT; m) | ||||
Morrison 2013 | 351 | 312.5 to 433.25 | P = 0.43 | CFO (9) |
390 | 375.5 to 437 | shoes (5) | ||
cadence (steps/min.) | ||||
Morrison 2013 | 114.7 | 108.6 to 124.9 | P = 0.019 | CFO (9) |
131.9 | 123.8 to 145 | shoes (5) | ||
double support (%) | ||||
Morrison 2013 | 25 | 21.7 to 26.9 | P = 0.042 | CFO (9) |
21.5 | 19.3 to 22.3 | shoes (5) | ||
stride (m) | ||||
Morrison 2013 | 107.5 | 102.2 to 122.3 | P = 0.23 | CFO (9) |
102 | 95.2 to 111.9 | shoes (5) |