Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;2022(1):CD006311. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006311.pub3

Comparison 9. Anti‐pronation taping versus sham taping.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
9.1 Balance test (SEBT) at 4 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
9.1.1 anterior 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.73 [‐4.70, 8.16]
9.1.2 posterior 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.50 [‐7.49, 8.49]
9.1.3 medial 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.27 [‐5.95, 6.49]
9.1.4 lateral 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.05 [‐7.24, 7.34]
9.2 Agility test (Illinois Agility Test) at 4 weeks 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.31 [‐1.08, 0.46]
9.3 Vertical jump height (cm) 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.37 [‐1.37, 2.11]