Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;26(11):6975–6991. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01129-7

Fig. 1. The scanning ultrasound equipment accurately delivers treatment and does not generate aversive levels of heat.

Fig. 1

A Schematic detail of the sonication procedure, indicating that the transducer sonicates a large area of the mouse brain during each treatment. B Schematic of the movement pattern of the transducer (black arrow). The start and end points are specified, and the transducer was scanned over the area in a raster grid pattern. A typical whole brain sonication used a 5 × 6 spot sonication pattern, covering virtually all of the cerebrum. Each mouse was rotated 180° for subsequent treatments. C To highlight the specificity of the sonication process, less than half of the brain was scanned using a 2 × 6 spot sonication path. The illustration shows a mouse brain following such a SUS+MB sonication to regionally open the BBB, with Evans blue extravasation visualizing this scanning pattern. D The brain from (C) cut coronally in 1 mm sections, with the Evans blue staining showing that ultrasound penetrated through the entirety of the brain. E Representative temperature versus time plot for the sonication using a gray matter mimetic. Note the temperature rise beginning at ~40 s of the elapsed time (red arrow), and the rapid decline after the 6 s sonication ended (black arrow). F Average temperature change (ΔT °C) measured at the skull and with gray matter mimetic 6 s after sonication (n = 6, mean ± SD).