Table 1.
Behaviour, fate processes and removal efficiencies for selected COVID-19 therapeutic drugs in aquatic environments
Compound | Aquatic matrix type | Contaminant levels | Fate process or treatment method | Outcome or removal efficiency | Half-life | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azithromycin | Municipal wastewater treatment plant | 0.12–3.68 µg/L | Activated sludge system with nitrification | No removal (0%) was observed | NR | Bhandari et al. (2008) |
Azithromycin | Simulated municipal wastewater effluent | Simulated | Photocatalysis using nanostructured TiO2 | Successfully removed within 30 min | NR | Čizmić et al. (2019) |
Azithromycin | Artificial freshwater | Simulated | Solar-like light | Removal was slow | 20 h | Tong et al. (2011) |
Azithromycin | Simulated California river system | Simulated | Aerobic and anaerobic degradation |
Very slow degradation rate under aerobic conditions No degradation under anaerobic conditions |
82.52 days (under aerobic conditions) | Vermillion Maier and Tjeerdema (2018) |
Chloroquine | Simulated membrane reactor | 10 g/L | Melanin-covered E. coli sorption process | 98.2% removal was achieved | NR | Lindroos et al. (2019) |
Chloroquine | Wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs) | NR | Primary biodegradation took weeks to months | 63% removal from WWTPs | NR | Kuroda et al. (2021) |
Hydroxychloroquine | Wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs) | NR | Primary biodegradation took weeks to months | 6.0% removal from WWTPs | NR | Kuroda et al. (2021) |
Hydroxychloroquine | Ultrapure, spring, river, and sea water | Simulated | Photolysis under solar radiation (300–800 nm) |
– pH affects degradation process – Humic acids, nitrate, and Fe (III) enhanced photodegradation |
11.6 h (ultrapure water) 0.42 h (river water) |
Dabić et al. (2019) |
Dexamethasone | Batch laboratory system | 5–40 mg/L | Batch adsorption using clinoptilolite zeolite | Maximum of 78% was removed | NR | Mohseni et al. (2016) |
Indomethacin | Batch laboratory system | Simulated | Ozonation | 80% removal rate was achieved | NR | Zhao et al. (2017) |
Indomethacin | Batch laboratory system | Simulated | Thermo-activated persulphate oxidation | 85.5% removal rate was achieved | NR | Li et al. (2018) |
Ivermectin | Batch laboratory system using real field samples | Simulated | Natural attenuation in a water/sediment system | 31.3% of initially applied ivermectin were transformed | < 6 h | Prasse et al. (2009) |
Ivermectin | Simulated water/soil system using field soil samples | 500 µg/L | Dissipation under aerobic condition at 19.3 °C | NR |
15.5 days (sandy soil) 11.5 days (clay soil) |
Rath et al. (2016) |
Ivermectin | Simulated water/soil system using field soil samples | 500 µg/L | Photocatalysis under UV-C and TiO2 | 98% removed | NR | Rath et al. (2016) |
Ivermectin | Outdoor aquatic mesocosm | 0–1000 ng/L | Concentration in sediment increased and became stable | NR | 3–5 days (in water) | Sanderson et al. (2007) |
Ivermectin | Field water and sediment samples | Simulated using 14C-labelled compounds | Dissipation in water/sediment system | NR |
15 days (in sediment) 2.9 days (in water) |
Löffler et al. (2005) |
Metformin | Wastewater treatment plant | Up to 100 µg/L |
– Activated carbon and flocculation were least effective – Ordered chlorination and ozonation were most effective |
88–97% removed | NR | Scheurer et al. (2012) |
Oseltamivir | River water | 50 µg/L | Daylight exposure | NR | 17.8 days | Bartels and von Tümpling (2008) |
Oseltamivir |
Sewage works Surface waters Water/sediment system |
NA | NR |
– No removal from sewage works – No degradation in surface waters – 50% degradation in water/sediment system |
100 days in water/sediment system | Straub (2009) |
Oseltamivir | Synthetic influent wastewater | NA | Simulated activated sludge system | 41% removed | NR | Slater et al. (2011) |
Ribavirin | Ribavirin medicine wastewater | Chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 7000 mg/L | Universal broadcast filter anaerobic reactor system | 72.8% COD removed | NR | Jain et al. (2013) |
Spironolactone | Wastewater | 1 mg/L | Activated sludge system | > 90% removed | NR | Sulaiman et al. (2015) |
NR not reported, NA not applicable