Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 Jul 16;51(4):453–468. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2021.1941057

Table 1.

Study Codes with Definitions, Levels, and Inter-Rater Reliability

Research
Question
Codes Code Definitions Code Levels Kappa
2 Availability Availability of measure for use
beyond the original research
study setting
Available in the public domain with no associated cost; Available with associated cost; Unavailable .84
2 Psychometric Indicator Was at least one psychometric indicator reported for measure? Yes; No .98
3 Information Source Source providing information / completing the measure Service Records/Setting; Youth; Caregiver; Provider; Research Staff/Observer .89
3 Target Individual about whom the
measure was completed
Youth; Caregiver; Family; Provider .76
4 Administration Count Number of times measure was completed over course of study Count 1.00
4 Timing The timing of measurement
within the course of treatment
Before treatment; during/after 1st treatment session; repeatedly (measured multiple times over course of treatment); pre/post (measured before treatment and after conclusion of treatment); after conclusion of treatment; other .78
4 Purpose The purpose for which the
measure was collected in the
study
Initial evaluation (completed prior to engagement intervention); Progress Monitoring (to evaluate change in an engagement domain over the course of an intervention); Outcome Measure (dependent variable to determine intervention efficacy); Other .57
4 Informed Treatment Were measure data used in treatment planning, intervention selection, intervention adaptation, or another component of treatment/intervention delivery? Yes; No 1.00

Note. “Engagement Domain” was coded for 48 studies in (Becker et al. (2018)). For the additional four studies coded in the current study, the kappa value for engagement domain was 1.00.