Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 15;22:29. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02439-0

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis of overall survival

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) 1.23 (0.85,1.78) 0.273
Gender (Female vs. Male) 1.26 (0.87,1.84) 0.228
Family history of cancer (YES vs. NO) 1.14 (0.76,1.69) 0.530
TNM stage (II vs. I) 1.42 (0.87,2.32) 0.160 1.14 (0.6,2.15) 0.694
TNM stage (III vs. I) 2.72 (1.78,4.15)  < 0.001 2.03 (1.19,3.47) 0.010
TNM stage (IV vs. I) 5.44 (1.68,17.63) 0.005 6.91 (2.09,22.89) 0.002
Histologic grade (G3–G4 vs. G1–G2) 1.14 (0.78,1.67) 0.489
Ishak score (5–6 vs. 0–4) 0.87 (0.5,1.5) 0.612
Child–Pugh grade (B–C vs. A) 1.66 (0.82,3.36) 0.159
Vascular invasion (Micro vs. none) 1.16 (0.72,1.88) 0.539 1.07 (0.61,1.87) 0.824
Vascular invasion (Macro vs. none) 2.52 (1.14,5.58) 0.023 1.84 (0.8,4.24) 0.150
Alpha fetoprotein (positive vs. negative) 1.45 (0.92,2.28) 0.108
Residual tumor (R1–R2 vs. R0) 1.17 (0.43,3.2) 0.754
TOP2A (high vs. low) 1.26 (1.11,1.42)  < 0.001 1.21 (1.04,1.39) 0.011

Statistically signifcant p values are given in bold p < 0.05

HR hazard ratio; CI confdence interval