Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;2016(1):CD012004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012004

Hemmati 2011.

Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 24 women were included (12 experimental and 12 control). All participants were from a convenience sample of friends and family.
Interventions Motor control exercise versus no treatment
Outcomes Pain (NRS 0 to 10)
Disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI))
Notes Data were extracted by a Persian translator
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Adequate random sequence generation used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No mention of any attempts to blind the participants
Blinding of personnel/care provider (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No mention of any attempts to blind the care provider
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of any attempts to blind the assessor
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk There is no mention of loss to follow‐up or how many were included at the follow‐up
Intention‐to‐treat analysis Unclear risk No mention of intention‐to‐treat analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No previous protocol or trial registration, but it was clear that the published report included all expected outcomes
Group similarity at baseline (selection bias) Low risk Patients did not differ in their baseline characteristics
Co‐interventions (performance bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Compliance (performance bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Timing of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned