Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 3;8:773339. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.773339

Table 2.

Association between UFH use and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis- induced coagulopathy.

Pre-matched cohort Control group (n = 1,069) UFH group (n = 751) p -value Effect size (95% CI) p -value
28-day mortalitya 389 (36.4%) 128 (17.1%) <0.001 HR = 0.361 (0.294, 0.442) <0.001
Hospital mortalitya 407 (38.1%) 148 (19.7%) <0.001 HR = 0.414 (0.314, 0.502) <0.001
Length of ICU stay, daysb 6.8 (4.2, 12.1) 11.3 (6.9, 18.1) <0.001 β = 4.472 (3.539, 5.406) <0.001
Length of hospital stay, daysb 13.2 (8.5, 22.3) 17.4 (12.2, 27.6) <0.001 β = 3.409 (1.966, 4.852) <0.001
Intracranial hemorrhagec 50 (4.7%) 68 (9.1%) 0.002 OR = 1.933 (1.317, 2.837) <0.001
Gastrointestinal bleedingc 19 (1.8%) 17 (2.3%) 0.463 OR = 1.320 (0.673, 2.589) 0.419
Post-matched cohort Control group (n = 652) UFH group (n = 652)
28-day mortality 246 (37.7%) 110 (16.9%) <0.001 HR = 0.323 (0.258, 0.406) <0.001
Hospital mortality 251 (38.5%) 128 (19.6%) <0.001 HR = 0.380 (0.307, 0.472) <0.001
Length of ICU stay, days 7.0 (4.5, 13.1) 11.1 (6.8,17.8) <0.001 β = 3.660 (2.495, 4.767) <0.001
Length of hospital stay, days 13.2 (7.4, 23.1) 17.5 (12.6, 26.2) <0.001 β = 3.479 (1.849, 5.162) <0.001
Intracranial hemorrhage 37 (5.7%) 54 (8.3%) 0.065 OR = 1.480 (0.955, 2.294) 0.080
Gastrointestinal bleeding 13 (2.0%) 14 (2.1%) 0.814 OR = 1.094 (0.503, 2.382) 0.820

Values are shown as median (interquartile range) or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

a

Cox regression was used for estimating the impact of UFH use on mortality outcomes after adjusting for confounding variables selected based on p-value < 0.05 in univariate analysis and clinical experience. Results were given as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

b

Linear regression model was used to evaluate the impact of UFH use on length of stay after adjusting for age, gender, SOFA score and SAPSII. Results were given as beta coefficient and 95% CI.

c

Bivariate logistic regression was used to assess the associations between UFH use and bleeding complications after adjusting for age, gender, platelet count, INR, PTT, SOFA score and SAPSII. Results were given as odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI.