Table 4.
Comparison of actual and predicted values of Tearing Strength.
| Sl. No. | Dots Per Inch (DPI) | Pixel Time (μs) | Warp way |
Weft way |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Tearing Strength (lb) | Fuzzy model predicted Tearing Strength(lb) | Relative Error (%) | Actual Tearing Strength (lb) | Fuzzy model predicted Tearing Strength(lb) | Relative Error (%) | |||
| 1 | 15 | 100 | 6.90 | 6.60 | 4.35 | 7.21 | 6.90 | 4.30 |
| 2 | 15 | 150 | 5.81 | 5.98 | 2.93 | 6.40 | 6.23 | 2.66 |
| 3 | 15 | 200 | 5.10 | 5.05 | 0.98 | 5.30 | 5.25 | 0.94 |
| 4 | 20 | 100 | 5.79 | 5.98 | 3.28 | 5.90 | 6.23 | 5.59 |
| 5 | 20 | 150 | 4.98 | 5.05 | 1.41 | 5.36 | 5.25 | 2.05 |
| 6 | 20 | 200 | 4.12 | 4.13 | 0.24 | 4.30 | 4.28 | 0.47 |
| 7 | 25 | 100 | 4.88 | 5.05 | 3.48 | 5.15 | 5.25 | 1.94 |
| 8 | 25 | 150 | 3.97 | 4.13 | 4.03 | 4.10 | 4.28 | 4.39 |
| 9 |
25 |
200 |
3.20 |
3.50 |
9.37 |
3.30 |
3.61 |
9.39 |
| Mean Relative Error (%) | 3.34 | 3.53 | ||||||
| Correlation coefficient (R) | 0.99 | 0.99 | ||||||
| Co-efficient of determination (R2) | 0.98 | 0.98 | ||||||