Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;8(1):e08721. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08721

Table 6.

Maximum likelihood estimates of second-stage Heckman selection estimation of determinants of market participation intensity.

Variables Truncated regression
Coefficient Std.Er. Z P > Z
Sex of household -.148 .200 -0.74 0.458
Household size .1256∗∗∗ .044 2.82 0.005
Education level .121∗∗∗ .020 6.05 0.000
Years of experience .043∗∗∗ .011 3.82 0.000
Enset land .259 .423 0.61 0.540
Livestock ownership -.262∗∗∗ .062 -4.21 0.000
Credit access .234 .155 1.51 0.130
Frequency of extension contact .089 .057 1.55 0.121
Access to raining .131 .143 0.91 0.361
Perception on price .017 .079 0.22 0.823
Market information -.231 .135 -1.71 0.087
Market distance .018 .011 1.56 0.118
Access to transport -.115 .133 -0.87 0.387
Quantity produced .002∗∗∗ .0003 7.87 0.000
Off/non-farm income (log) -.038∗∗ .0189 -2.01 0.045
_cons -1.403∗∗∗ .4004 -3.50 0.000
Mills lambda .155∗∗ .0763 2.04 0.042
Rho 0.839
Sigma .185

Source: own survey (2019), ∗, ∗∗ and ∗∗∗ indicates 10%, 5% and 1% of significance probability level.