Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 26;2004(1):CD003978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003978.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Alaranta 1991 No description of the study population, no randomisation, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot.
Arya 1995 A heterogeneous study population, no randomisation, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot, inadequate data presentation.
Hayden 2000 A heterogeneous study population, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot
James 1986 A heterogeneous study population, no randomisation, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot, inadequate data presentation.
Mizuno 1992 Unclear study‐design. Information about study population is unclear.
Nyska 2002 No description of the study population, a heterogeneous study population, no randomisation, inadequate description of the experimental intervention, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot, too small sample size, inadequate data presentation.
Torburn 1994 No description of the study population, no randomisation
vd Water 1998 No description of the study population, no randomisation, inadequate description of the experimental intervention, comparison between The Camp Normal Activity Foot and the subject's own prosthesis.
Wagner 1987 No description of the study population, no randomisation, inadequate description of the experimental intervention, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot.
Wirta 1991 A heterogeneous study population, no randomisation, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot, inadequate data presentation.
Yack 1999 No description of the study population, inadequate description of the experimental intervention, no time to adapt to the new prosthetic foot, too small sample size.