Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2022 Jan 14;63(1):20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.20

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright 2022 The Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 5. — Analysis of case 4 (row 1), case 5 (row 2), and case 6 (row 3). (A) Visit 1 sub-RPE OCT slab with the visit 1 and visit 2 margins of the geographic atrophy (GA) overlaid. The green arrow in panel A of case 9 points to a region of OCT hyper-transmission that was excluded from the GA tracing because it is surrounded by the MNV lesion (see panel B, same row). The purple arrows in panel A of case 9 points to two newly appearing GA foci, which were not included in the analysis. (B) Local GA growth rates displayed along the visit 1 GA margin (see color bar). (C) Scatterplot of local GA growth rates versus local distances to the macular neovascularization (MNV). The vertical dashed line corresponds to the 1 mm distance-to-MNV. (D) Boxplots, in 100 µm distance-to-MNV intervals, of the local GA growth rates within 1 mm from the MNV. Outliers are indicated by teal markers.