Table 4.
Secondary outcomes | Absolute event rate (n) (cluster n = 40) |
RD 95%CIaa |
OR 95%CIb |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | Control | |||
Traditional childbirth | ||||
Total traditional childbirths c d |
0.19 (75/394) |
0.11 (48/457) |
0.10 0.02 to 0.18 |
2.95 1.27 to 6.84 |
Childbirth with traditional midwife c |
0.31 (123/392) |
0.20 (90/456) |
0.14 0.03 to 0.25 |
2.49 2.20 to 5.17 |
Childbirth at home |
0.40 (158/394) |
0.25 (114/454) |
0.04 − 0.11 to 0.19 |
1.13 0.52 to 2.45 |
Vertical childbirthc |
0.29 (111/388) |
0.18 (81/454) |
0.12 0.03 to 0.22 |
2.38 1.26 to 4.47 |
Company of family during childbirth c |
0.63 (244/390) |
0.46 (205/450) |
0.17 0.06 to 0.28 |
2.21 1.41 to 3.48 |
Intention of future childbirth at WHC c |
0.64 (244/379) |
0.80 (362/453) |
−0.17 − 0.26 to − 0.07 |
0.37 0.21 to 0.66 |
Traditional midwife saw the woman at least once |
0.78 (406/523) |
0.73 (458/624) |
0.06 −0.02 to 0.14 |
1.47 0.93 to 2.33 |
Access to health care services | ||||
Woman went to WHC for antenatal care |
0.95 (497/523) |
0.96 (590/618) |
0.00 −0.04 to 0.03 |
1.04 0.49 to 2.22 |
At least 5 check-ups with WHC |
0.71 (264/376) |
0.74 (323/437) |
−0.03 − 0.12 to 0.05 |
0.88 0.57 to 1.36 |
Gestational age of first recourse to WHC* |
3.0 (0.3, n = 392) |
3.0 (0.1, n = 459) |
||
Traditional midwife advised visiting WHC |
0.79 (246/310) |
0.82 (292/356) |
−0.06 −0.19 to 0.07 |
0.87 0.55 to 1.37 |
Childbirth with Western provider e |
0.61 (238/392) |
0.75 (340/456) |
− 0.01 − 0.16 to 0.11 |
0.88 0.39 to 1.99 |
Antenatal care with traditional midwife and childbirth with Western provider |
0.68 (161/237) |
0.70 (237/340) |
− 0.02 − 0.12 to 0.08 |
1.09 0.66 to 1.82 |
Unattended childbirths |
0.08 (31/392) |
0.06 (26/456) |
0.02 −0.02 to 0.06 |
1.58 0.74 to 3.35 |
Paid for childbirth |
0.38 (138/367) |
0.24 (106/443) |
0.12 − 0.02 to 0.25 |
1.83 0.95 to 3.52 |
Paid for childbirth with Western provider c |
0.28 (62/225) |
0.13 (44/331) |
0.14 0.04 to 0.24 |
2.67 1.26 to 5.66 |
Average cost of childbirth (USD)* |
68.6 (28.7, n = 138) |
84.3 (14.7, n = 106) |
||
Childbirth in Western facility | ||||
The woman chose childbirth position |
0.60 (139/231) |
0.61 (205/336) |
−0.08 − 0.24 to 0.08 |
0.97 0.57 to 1.66 |
Translator during childbirth (if needed) |
0.42 (63/151) |
0.32 (83/262) |
0.04 −0.09 to 0.18 |
1.59 0.94 to 2.69 |
Woman had to bathe with cold water c |
0.60 (138/231) |
0.45 (154/341) |
0.10 0.02 to 0.19 |
1.72 0.99 to 3.00 |
The woman received the placenta c |
0.56 (130/232) |
0.21 (69/335) |
0.34 0.21 to 0.48 |
6.15 3.24 to 11.7 |
Retention of amulets |
0.30 (68/229) |
0.27 (89/335) |
0.03 −0.09 to 0.15 |
1.18 0.67 to 2.06 |
The woman felt she was treated with respect |
0.89 (210/237) |
0.92 (312/338) |
−0.04 − 0.12 to 0.03 |
0.67 0.31 to 1.42 |
Behaviours | ||||
Woman eats same or more than usual during pregnancy |
0.22 (85/394) |
0.28 (125/453) |
−0.05 − 0.11 to 0.02 |
0.74 0.50 to 1.10 |
Woman works less than usual during pregnancy |
0.37 (144/394) |
0.39 (177/457) |
−0.01 − 0.10 to 0.09 |
0.90 0.62 to 1.30 |
WHC Western health care facility, RD risk difference, OR odds ratio
aBaseline-adjusted cluster-level analysis using t-test as presented by Campbell, 2014
bOR and confidence intervals calculated with a GLMM using lme4 package in R
csignificant differences at the 5% level
dat home, with traditional midwife and family and in preferred vertical position
edoctor, nurse or health promotor
*Average (standard deviation SD, n)