Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 11;46(1):124–130. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001249

TABLE 2.

Comparison of MRI Features Between DG and SG GH Pituitary Adenomas

Variable DG (n = 36) SG (n = 34) z/χ2 P
Tumor size, median (IQR), cm
 Mean diameter 1.767 (1.308–2.433) 2.450 (1.725–2.792) 2.104 0.035*
 Mean diameter 6.507 0.039
  <1.5 13 (37.1) 6 (17.6)
  1.5–2.2 10 (28.6) 6 (17.6)
  >2.2 12 (34.3) 22 (64.7)
 Maximum diameter 1.950 (1.500–2.850) 3.000 (1.975–3.325) 2.523 0.012*
 Maximum diameter 6.050 0.049
  <1.6 19 (52.8) 9 (26.5)
  1.6–2.3 10 (17.8) 12 (35.3)
  >2.3 7 (19.4) 13 (38.2)
Homogeneity, n (%) 0.243 0.622
 Homogeneous 18 (50) 19 (55.9)
 Heterogeneous 18 (50) 15 (44.1) 0.000 1.000
  Cystic necrosis 12 (33.3) 10 (29.4)
  Hemorrhage 6 (16.7) 5 (14.7)
T2 signal intensity, n (%) 5.426 0.020
 Hypointense 31 (86.1) 21 (61.8)
 Hyperintense 5 (13.9) 13 (38.2)
T2 rSI, n (%) 10.212 0.001
 <1 30 (83.3) 16 (47.1)
 >1 6 (16.7) 18 (52.9)
Contrast enhancement, n (%) 10.380 0.001
 Mild-moderate 21 (58.3) 7 (20.6)
 Marked 15 (41.7) 27 (79.4)
Knosp grade, n (%) 11.187 0.004
 0–1 17 (47.2) 5 (14.7)
 2–3 16 (44.4) 18 (52.9)
 4 3 (8.3) 11 (32.3)

*Comparisons between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.

IQR indicates interquartile range.