Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;15:53–62. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S345427

Table 4.

Comparison of Participants Characteristics Between ABPA-S and ABPA-CB

ABPA-S (n=41) ABPA-CB (n=174) P value
Age (mean ± SD)2 38.31 ± 13.44 42.53 ± 13.24 0.002
Male, n (%) 17 (41.5%) 80 (46.0%) 0.56
Mucus plugs, n (%) 2 (4.9%) 50 (28.7%) 0.001
Laboratory examination
Total eosinophil count cell (×10^9/L) (mean ± SD) 0.98 ± 0.34 1.85 ± 0.65 0.001
Total IgE level (IU/mL) (mean ± SD) 4146.34 ± 1723.43 4572.32 ± 1366.76 0.04
Sp-IgE A. fumigatus
Grade 1–2 14 (34.1%) 29 (26.7%)
Grade 3–4 20 (48.8%) 116 (66.7%)
Grade 5–6 7 (17.1%) 29 (16.7%)
Spirometry (mean ± SD)
FVC% 80.4 ± 10.3 78.3 ± 9.8 0.03
FEV1% 65.9 ± 14.2 62.3 ± 10.4 0.12
FEV1/FVC 64.2 ± 12.3 63.7 ± 14.3 0.67
DLCO% 90.4 ± 9.2 82.6 ± 14.5 0.005
Clinical outcomes (n=154)
No. of 2-year follow-up 30 124
No. of relapses, n (%) 8 (26.7%) 67 (54.0%) 0.007

Abbreviations: ABPA-S, ABPA-serum; ABPA-CB, ABPA-central bronchiectasis; Sp-IgE, Aspergillus-specific immunoglobulin E; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1s; FVC, forced vital capacity; DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; SD, standard deviation.