Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;55(6):4755–4808. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10116-x

Table 6.

Device-free HAR models

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
# Features Feature extraction ML/DL model Architecture Metrics Validation Hyper-parameters/optimizer loss function CIT*
R1 Frequency Hand-crafted ELM AACA: using the difference between the activity and the stationary parts in the signal variance feature. For recognition use 3-layer ELM with an i/p layer with 200 neurons, an o/p (10) and hidden layer (40) neurons Accuracy Tested the performance on 1100 samples No. of hidden layer neurons (after 400 becomes stable), different users, impact of total no. of samples Yan et al. (2020)
R2 Frequency CSI Hand-crafted DTW: by comparing similarity b/w waveforms CP decomposition: decompose the CSI signals with CP and each rank-one tensor after decomposition is regarded as the feature. With DTW, we can compare the similarity between 2 waveforms and identify action Accuracy Recognition of gaits using MARS Impact of nearby people, test for system delay Fei et al. (2020)
R3 CSI (time & amplitude) Automatic LSTM CNN extracts spatial features from multiple antenna pairs, then CNN o/p is given to LSTM followed by FC FPR, precision, recall, F1-score DO, Layer size, recognition method Wang et al. (2019d)

*CIT citations, DTW dynamic time wraping, FPR false positive rate, DO dropout, ELM extreme learning machine, CSI channel state information