Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;2022:9932603. doi: 10.1155/2022/9932603

Table 5.

Mining test results of different explosive unit consumption.

Unit consumption/kg/m3 Row spacing (m) Hole bottom distance (m) Mining effect Open wiring condition Top board situation Two side-wall situation Rear blast hole situation
091–095 16 20 Overgrind of ore Damaged severely Lots of falling lumps and pumice More slanting side-wall Serious blocking of holes and dislocation
086–091 16 20 Small lumpiness, partly fine ore Small damage More pumice Less slanting side-wall More plugged holes, less dislocation
082–086 16 20 Uniform lumpiness, less fine ore Less damage Partial pumice and falling lumps Less slanting side-wall Less plugged holes and dislocation
075–082 16 20 Uneven lumpiness, high lump rate Less damage Less pumice and falling lumps Rarely slanting side-wall Occasionally plugged or misplaced