Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 19;16(2):319–332. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13122

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariable analyses of T2D prognostic impact. F, female; L, left; M, male; R, right.

Co‐variate Dichotomization Median survivals No. of events/patients P at univariate HR 95% CI P at multivariate
Age < 65 years vs ≥ 65 years 15.3 vs 12.6 42/95 vs 48/108 0.3141 1.22 0.75–1.99 0.4098
Gender M vs F 13.6 vs 15.0 45/98 vs 45/105 0.7870 0.82 0.51–1.32 0.4276
Side L vs R 15.3 vs 12.6 31/73 vs 59/130 0.3431 1.33 0.80–2.19 0.2584
Metastatic involvement 1 site vs > 1 27.3 vs 9.0 15/38 vs 75/165 0.0002 2.36 1.30–4.27 0.0043
Response to firs‐line CT DC vs not DC 22.6 vs 8.6 43/107 vs 34/78 0.0005 0.50 0.30–0.82 0.0065
Glucose metabolism status T2D vs not T2D 9.6 vs 17.3 21/41 vs 69/162 0.0197 2.01 1.11–3.64 0.0226