TABLE 2.
Comparison of the silkworm economic traits.
| Genotype | Female | Male | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole cocoon weight (g) | Cocoon shell weight (g) | Cocoon shell rate (%) | Whole cocoon weight (g) | Cocoon shell weight (g) | Cocoon shell rate (%) | |
| WT | 1.127 ± 0.046 | 0.118 ± 0.008 | 10.45 ± 0.003 | 0.890 ± 0.030 | 0.113 ± 0.011 | 12.65 ± 0.005 |
| Ser-2A-hEGF | 1.062 ± 0.049 a | 0.105 ± 0.007 a | 9.91 ± 0.004 a | 0.825 ± 0.047 a | 0.097 ± 0.011 a | 11.66 ± 0.007 a |
| Ser-T-hEGF | 1.023 ± 0.047 a | 0.107 ± 0.012 a | 10.42 ± 0.011 a | 0.754 ± 0.046 a | 0.097 ± 0.013 a | 12.95 ± 0.016 a |
| Ser-2A-EGFP | 0.913 ± 0.038 a | 0.107 ± 0.008 a | 10.17 ± 0.005 a | 0.766 ± 0.041 a | 0.092 ± 0.010 a | 12.49 ± 0.006 a |
Note. Female and male animals were separated and used for statistics. The data shown are mean ± S.D. (n = 30). The asterisks stand for significance with p < 0.05.
Significance between WT and transformed lines.