Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 4;75(1):293–302. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02859-y

Table 3.

Clinical parameters and their impact on PFS and OS based on univariate and multivariate analyses

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
PFS
Previous targeted therapya Yes (n = 7) vs. no (n = 43) 0.650 0.273–1.547 0.330 0.554 0.220–1,392 0.209
Previous PRRT Yes (n = 13) vs. no (n = 37) 1.724 0.886–3.357 0.109 1.919 0.956–3,855 0.067
Resection of primary tumour (n = 23) vs. no resection (n = 27) 0.969 0.541–1.736 0.915 0.985 0.524–1,849 0.961
Bone metastases Yes (n = 19) vs. no (n = 31) 1.144 0.625–2.093 0.663 1.123 0.608–2,074 0.711
OS from STZ CTx
Previous targeted therapya Yes (n = 7) vs. no (n = 43) 1.324 0.544–3.220 0.537 1.464 0.543–3.946 0.452
Previous PRRT Yes (n = 13) vs. no (n = 37) 1.609 0.773–3.353 0.204 1.429 0.581–3.516 0.437
Resection of primary tumour (n = 23) vs. no resection (n = 27) 0.771 0.386–1.543 0.463 0.614 0.279–1.352 0.226
Bone metastases Yes (n = 19) vs. no (n = 31) 2.710 1.285–5.716 0.009 2.637 1.205–5.772 0.015

All p-values have been specified as italicized values and all values showing statistical significance were highlighted using bold characters

aEverolimus and/ or sunitinib