Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;8:788771. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.788771

Table 2.

Risk of bias using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Study Selection Comparability Outcome Score
Representativeness of exposed cohort Selection of non-exposed cohort Exposure Outcome of interest not present at start Comparability of PRFA vs. SRFA Assessment of outcome Follow-up Adequacy of follow-up
Eun, H. S Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restricted, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 9⋆
Chen, S Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Unclear Record linkage Yes Unclear 7⋆
Khan, M. R Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restricted, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 9⋆
Li, J Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restricted, matched Record linkage Yes Unclear 8⋆
Hirooka, M Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Not restricted, matched Record linkage Yes Unclear 7⋆
Sherif, Z Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restricted, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 9⋆
Zhang, W Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restrictions, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 8⋆
Curley, S. A Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Unclear Record linkage Yes Complete 8⋆
Raut, C. P Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restrictions, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 8⋆
Huang, J. W Truly representative Same Surgical records Yes Restrictions, matched Record linkage Yes Complete 9⋆

PRFA, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation; SRFA, surgical radiofrequency ablation.