Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 17;13:342. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28034-z

Table 2.

Comparison of observed and expected consistency in differentially abundant genera across five diarrhea datasets.

Tool No. sig. genera Max overlap Mean exp. Mean obs. Fold diff. p
ALDEx2 57 3 1.141 1.544 1.353 <0.001
limma voom (TMM) 76 4 1.22 1.618 1.326 <0.001
MaAsLin2 (rare) 74 3 1.204 1.595 1.325 <0.001
ANCOM-II 15 3 1.033 1.333 1.29 <0.001
MaAsLin2 79 3 1.215 1.557 1.281 <0.001
Wilcoxon (rare) 88 4 1.269 1.625 1.281 <0.001
metagenomeSeq 66 3 1.164 1.485 1.276 <0.001
Wilcoxon (CLR) 82 3 1.22 1.549 1.27 <0.001
limma voom (TMMwsp) 85 4 1.239 1.565 1.263 <0.001
t-test (rare) 62 3 1.145 1.403 1.225 <0.001
corncob 87 5 1.275 1.552 1.217 <0.001
DESeq2 82 4 1.246 1.512 1.213 <0.001
LEfSe 119 5 1.408 1.613 1.146 <0.001
edgeR 138 5 1.509 1.667 1.105 0.002

No. sig. genera: Number of genera significant in at least one dataset; Max overlap: Maximum number of datasets where a genus was called significant by this tool; Mean exp.: Mean number of datasets that each genus is expected to be significant in (of the genera that are significant at least once); Mean obs.: Mean number of datasets that each genus was observed to be significant in (of the genera that are significant at least once); Fold diff.: Fold difference of mean observed over mean expected number of times significant genera are found across multiple datasets; p: p-value based on one-tailed permutation test that used the ‘Mean obs.’ as the test statistic. Note that <0.001 is indicated instead of exact values, because 0.001 was the minimum non-zero p-value we could estimate based on our permutation approach. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.