Table 1.
Overview of the most popular exosome isolation techniques.
Exosome isolation techniques | Methods | Advantages | Limitations | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ultracentrifugation techniques | Differential ultracentrifugation | Easy to use | Time consuming | (69) |
Little sample pretreatment | Requires large starting sample volumes | |||
Affordability over time | Low exosome recovery | |||
Density gradient centrifugation | Effective for exosomes from protein aggregates and non-membranous particles | Low exosome recovery | (70) | |
Useful for separating exosomes and other EVs from body fluids | ||||
Size-based isolation techniques | Ultrafiltration | Less time consuming | Particle deformation | (67) |
Requires no special instrumentation | Lysis of exosomes | |||
Sequential filtration | Automatable | Rigid components associated with cellular debris are filtered away | (72) | |
Produces intact and biologically active exosome material | ||||
Size exclusion chromatography | Preserves vesicle structure, integrity, and biological activity | Requires run times of several hours | (68, 71) | |
Not easily scalable | ||||
Cannot be used for high throughput applications. | ||||
Immunoaffinity capture-based techniques | Magneto-immunoprecipitation | Higher isolation efficiency | Protein/antigen used to capture the exosomes must be expressed on the surface of exosomes | (66, 67) |
Can handle large sample volumes | ||||
Preserves the activity of exosomal proteins | Specificity of the assay is limited to specificity of the antibody. | |||
Exosome precipitation | Polyethylene glycol precipitation | Quick | Lack of selectivity | (69) |
Simple | ||||
Requires little technical expertise or expensive equipment | ||||
Can be used for various starting volumes |