Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;43(3):1087–1102. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25709

TABLE 2.

Prediction accuracy (correlation between true and predicted cognitive scores) for sex‐specific models predicting cognitive composite scores and individual task scores

Male‐trained Female‐trained
Male‐tested Female‐tested Male‐tested Female‐tested
Total composite .48 (.12) *** .36 (.14) * .46 (.19) *** .24 (.17) *
Crystallised composite .29 (.18) .39 (.14) * .38 (.16) *** .32 (.16) *
Picture vocabulary .35 (.15) * .38 (.16) *** .39 (.11) *** .36 (.13) *
Reading .17 (.16) .28 (.13) * .30 (.18) * .21 (.18)
Fluid composite .37 (.17) * .24 (.16) .30 (.18) .13 (.19)
Flanker −.02 (.22) .17 (.17) .13 (.17) −.10 (.17)
Dimensional change card sort .30 (.22) *** .19 (.18) .25 (.22) .04 (.19)
Picture sequence memory .25 (.18) .07 (.19) .05 (.19) .15 (.17)
List sorting .09 (.17) .15 (.21) .15 (.19) −.10 (.16)
Processing speed .24 (.16) .19 (.17) .26 (.19) .01 (.18)

Note: Median prediction accuracy (interquartile range) is shown. Bolded prediction accuracy values denote that the model performed better than chance after corrections for multiple comparisons.

*

p <.05.

**

p <.01.

***

p <.001.