Table 3.
Example of studies that have used rearing designs that explicitly recorded family-level variation in ecologically important monarch traits. Monarch family refers to all offspring from one female butterfly
| Study | Trait(s) assayed | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Altizer and Davis (2010) | Forewing size, forewing shape | Substantial variation among families; substantial variation among populations (eastern, western, South Florida) corresponding to migratory status |
| Ladner and Altizer (2005) | Larval performance across host plants, oviposition preference | Substantial variation among families for oviposition preference and performance across hosts |
| Freedman et al. (2020) | Larval performance across host plants | Substantial variation in family quality, but little family-level variation in performance rank order across host species |
| Freedman et al. (2018) | Induction of reproductive arrest | Substantial family-level variation in post-eclosion reproductive development in monarchs from Australia |
| Davis et al. (2005) | Larval and adult melanism | Substantial variation among families and between populations (eastern, western, South Florida) |
| De Roode and Altizer (2010) | Resistance to OE | Strong host family effects for level of parasite virulence |
| Sternberg et al. (2013) | Tolerance to OE | Substantial variation among families and between populations (eastern, western, South Florida, Hawaii) |