Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;21:21. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01499-8

Table 1.

Patient demographics and clinicopathological characteristics of the training and validation cohorts

CHSUMC cohort P value ATH cohort P value P value
Variables Healthy Patient Healthy Patient
(n = 120) (n = 200) (n = 60) (n = 140)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age (years) 60.69 ± 8.66 61.06 ± 9.05 0.720B 61.13 ± 9.20 61.24 ± 8.65 0.936B 0.852B
Gender
 Female 50 (41.7) 74 (37.0) 0.410A 25 (41.7) 47 (33.6) 0.335A 0.566A
 Male 70 (58.3) 126 (63.0) 35 (58.3) 93 (66.4)
Tumor depthC
 T1/T2 NA 58 (29.0) NA 52 (37.1) 0.126A
 T3/T4 NA 142 (71.0) NA 88 (62.9)
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative NA 85 (42.5) NA 70 (50.0) 0.185A
 Positive NA 115 (57.5) NA 70 (50.0)
Histological differentiation
 Poor NA 41 (20.5) NA 18 (12.9) 0.179A
 Moderate NA 99 (49.5) NA 78 (55.7)
 Well NA 60 (30.0) NA 44 (31.4)
Largest tumor dimension (cm) NA 4.86 ± 1.45 NA 5.01 ± 1.44 0.319B
TNM Stage
 I/II NA 78 (39.0) NA 66 (47.1) 0.148A
 III/IV NA 122 (61.0) NA 74 (52.9)

For categorical variables, the number of patients was shown as n (%); quantitive variables were mean ± SD

Aχ2 test was used for comparing control and patient group

BUnpaired t test was used for comparing control and patient group

CTumor depth indicated that how deeply tumor cells have invaded