Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;204(1):e00421-21. doi: 10.1128/JB.00421-21

TABLE 2.

PTM identification following database searching and manual verification of the matched fragmentation spectra for RrpAhis6 and RrpBhis6 proteinsa

Sample Peptide m/z Charge Mass (Da) Residue(s) Total ion current (TIC) intensity
RrpA (control) 4ENSPCDhaNFEECdioxGFNYTLALINGK25 821.03 3 2,460.1 Cys8; Cys13 208,300
28MSILYCDhaLFR36 556.30 2 1,110.6 Cys33 204,200
28MoxSILYCDhaLFR36 564.30 2 1,126.6 Met28; Cys33 110,600
RrpA (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone) 4ENSPCDhaNFEECdioxGFNYTLALINGK25 821.03 3 2,460.1 Cys8; Cys13 1,119,000
28MSILYCDhaLFR36 556.30 2 1,110.6 Cys33 877,900
RrpA (H2O2) 4ENSPCDhaNFEECdioxGFNYTLALINGK25 821.03 3 2,460.1 Cys8; Cys13 849,400
28MoxSILYCDhaLFR36 564.30 2 1,126.6 Met28; Cys33 259,400
RrpB (control) 4YHSLCsulfdioxPIETTLNLIGNK20 990.48 2 1,979 Cys8 37,140
RrpB (H2O2) 4YHSLCsulfdioxPIETTLNLIGNK20 990.48 2 1,979 Cys8 82,780
a

The complete data set is presented in Table S2.