The carotid body (CB) oxygen-sensing mechanism remains elusive. Mitochondrial complex I and complex IV of CB type I cells are the most likely oxygen sensor candidates for initiating the hypoxia-induced release of neurotransmitters (NT) to excite synaptically connected sinus nerve fibers [7]. CB cytochrome c oxidase (CBCcO) is specialized by the subunit COX 4i2 [2, 7] which is characterized by twofold lower oxygen affinity than COX 4i1 [8]. In general, CcO contains four redox centers: heme a and heme a3 linked by helix-X and two copper centers (CuA and CuB). Oxygen binds to the heme a3-CuB binuclear center as described in crystallographic studies on bovine CcO (bCcO) microcrystals [3]. When helix-X relaxes, communication between the two heme groups facilitates electron transfer from mitochondrial cytochrome c (complex III) over CuA to heme a and the binuclear center.
As surrogate for oxygen, CO and NO replace oxygen at the binuclear center in a light-sensitive way and inhibit electron transfer [3]. Upon light-induced CO photodissociation under reducing conditions, helix-X switches from the open to the closed state when ferrous heme a3 iron is in an exogenous ligand-free state like in hypoxia [3]. Based on these studies, we present a deeper understanding of the nature of the CB oxygen sensor by reanalyzing CO experiments on isolated rat CBs super-fused in vitro as shown in Fig. 1a [4]. Changing gas composition of the super-fusion medium from 20% O2, 3% CO2, 77% N2 (normoxia) to 97% N2, 3% CO2 (full hypoxia) is followed by a characteristic hypoxia-induced increased chemoreceptor sinus nerve activity (registration in black) serving as control. Replacing 77% N2 by CO induces an increased sinus nerve activity (registration in red) which is decreased to normoxic control levels by CO photo-dissociation and oxygen ligand binding to the binuclear a3-CuB center reestablishing electron transfer. Additional CO to fully replace O2 (resulting in 97% CO and 3% CO2) increases chemoreceptor sinus nerve activity (full hypoxia, registration in red). CO photo-dissociation is followed by a further increase of chemoreceptor discharge reaching hypoxic control levels. We propose that ferrous heme a3 iron now is in an exogenous ligand-free state and helix-X compressed into a closed conformation with inhibited electron transfer due to increased distance between heme a/a3.
We assume this large helix-X movement of about 3Ǻ [3] acts as a primary sensor signal to trigger chemoreceptor discharge under hypoxia by inducing a motion of the intracellular mitochondrial network [10] with subsequent cell shape changes (see Fig. 1c). This motion might trigger mechano-sensitive cation membrane channels leading to a primary rise of intracellular calcium initiating NT release.
To further characterize CBCcO, the mean hypoxic light absorption spectrum (black registration) of CBCcO was recorded (Fig. 1b; [1, 4]). The spectrum was fitted by deconvolution (red line) using characteristic light absorption spectra of mitochondrial cytochromes (c550, b563) and NADPH cytochrome (b558). CBCcO peaks at 592 nm and 603 nm matching light absorption spectra of bCcO-CO microcrystals peaking at a593nm (CO-bound) and a604nm (ferrous) [3]. We assume that the CBCcO double peak results from binding of NO produced under hypoxia [6]. NO inhibits hypoxic CB chemoreception, while it increases the chemosensory discharges in normoxia [6]. Upon binding to CBCcO, NO seems to induce the same helix-X changes like CO. NO ligand binding to CBCcO is reported to decrease oxygen consumption and favoring aerobic glycolysis [2]. Subsequent tissue acidification and lactate production as shown in Fig. 1c could lead to amplification of the primary calcium signal by closing TASK channels involving the PIN1/p47phox tandem [2] and influencing the Fp/(Fp + NAD(P)H) redox ratio [2, 5, 9].
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Acker H. The oxygen sensing signal cascade under the influence of reactive oxygen species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:2201–2210. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernardini A, Wolf A, Brockmeier U, Riffkin H, Metzen E, Acker-Palmer A, Fandrey J, Acker H. Carotid body type I cells engage flavoprotein and Pin1 for oxygen sensing. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318:C719–C731. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00320.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ishigami I, Zatsepin NA, Hikita M, Conrad CE, Nelson G, Coe JD, Basu S, Grant TD, Seaberg MH, Sierra RG, Hunter MS, Fromme P, Fromme R, Yeh SR, Rousseau DL. Crystal structure of CO-bound cytochrome c oxidase determined by serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography at room temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:8011–8016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705628114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lahiri S, Ehleben W, Acker H. Chemoreceptor discharges and cytochrome redox changes of the rat carotid body: role of heme ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9427–9432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li LZ, Xu HN, Ranji M, Nioka S. Mitochondrial redox imaging for cancer diagnostic and therapeutic studies. J Innov Opt Heal Sci. 2009;2:325–341. doi: 10.1142/S1793545809000735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moya EA, Alcayaga J, Iturriaga R. NO modulation of carotid body chemoreception in health and disease. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012;184:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ortega-Sáenz P, López-Barneo J. Physiology of the carotid body: from molecules to disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2020;82:127–149. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020518-114427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pajuelo Reguera D, Čunátová K, Vrbacký M, Pecinová A, Houštěk J, Mráček T, Pecina P. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform exchange results in modulation of oxygen affinity. Cells. 2020;9:443. doi: 10.3390/cells9020443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Torres-Torrelo H, Ortega-Sáenz P, Gao L, López-Barneo J. Lactate sensing mechanisms in arterial chemoreceptor cells. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24444-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zamponi N, Zamponi E, Cannas SA, Billoni OV, Helguera PR. Mitochondrial network complexity emerges from fission/fusion dynamics. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18351-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]