Table 2.

Estimates of logistic regression models on accessing THC

	I: Bivariate models			II: Full model
	OR	Sig.	95% CI	OR	Sig.	95% CI
Degree of DIT use
Low	Ref.			Ref.
High	1.62	*	1.05 − 2.52	1.86	*	1.10 − 3.17
No response	1.05		0.68 − 1.63	1.54		0.90 − 2.62
Destination-country social integration (MCA)	0.78	**	0.65 − 0.94	0.68	***	0.55 − 0.84
Discrimination	1.81	**	1.22 − 2.69	1.86	**	1.16 − 3.07
Woman	1.74	***	1.30 − 2.33	2.13	***	1.48 − 3.07
Age: 65 years or older	0.82		0.59 − 1.14	0.78		0.50 − 1.22
Tertiary education	1.40	*	1.01 − 1.94	1.55	*	1.04 − 2.30
Married or cohabiting	1.30		0.91 − 1.86	1.26		0.80 − 1.99
In paid work	0.81		0.58 − 1.12	0.68		0.41 − 1.12
High monthly household income: More than €2499	1.11		0.74 − 1.67	1.58	*	0.91 − 2.76
Financial hardship	0.79		0.56 − 1.12	0.94		0.61 − 1.44
Chronic illness	2.84	***	1.69 − 4.78	3.11	***	1.69 − 5.72
Accessed healthcare services in Finland during last 12 months	0.87		0.54 − 1.39	0.66		0.38 − 1.15
Visited origin country during last 12 months	7.90	***	4.10 − 15.22	5.54	***	2.75 − 11.14
Intercept				0.01	***	0.00 − 0.04
N				826

OR odds ratio; Sig. significance; CI confidence interval; Ref. reference category

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05