Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;12:939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04816-9

Table 3.

Environmental factors associated with ARI.

Environment Case, n (%) Control, n (%) Univariate analysis
Crude OR (95% CI) p value
Lao Loum ethnicity 125 (63.5) 109 (55.3) 2.77 (1.29–5.95) 0.009
Having children < 5 years in the house 142 (72.1) 148 (75.1) 0.78 (0.44–1.37) 0.397
Crowdinga 34 (17.3) 34 (17.3) 1 (0.58–1.70) 1
Smoker in the house 56 (28.6) 63 (32.1) 0.84 (0.53–1.34) 0.48
Self-sufficientb 191 (96.9) 193 (97.9) 0.5 (0.09–2.72) 0.423
Attended universityc 103 (52.3) 88 (44.7) 1.48 (0.94–2.33) 0.089
Biomass fuels used 187 (94.9) 177 (89.8) 2.25 (0.97–5.17) 0.05
Indoor pollutione 90 (45.7) 87 (44.1) 1.07 (0.69–1.65) 0.74
Untreated drinking water 4 (2) 2 (1) 3 (0.31–28.8) 0.34
No toilet/latrine 1 (0.5) 0 NA 1

Significant values are in bold.

aMore than 7 people living in the same house.

bThe income of the family is sufficient to live on judged by family.

cHighest form of education in the family.

dCharcoal or wood were used in cooking.

eMaking fire inside the house.