Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;42(1):BSR20212416. doi: 10.1042/BSR20212416

Table 2. Analysis and comparison of AI quantitative parameters among different pathological subtypes (mean ± standard deviation).

Parameters AAH/AIS MIA IAC H/χ 2 P-value
2D mean diameter (mm) 8.54 ± 2.23 10.19 ± 2.68 14.98 ± 4.06 92.735 <0.001
3D mean diameter (mm) 8.44 ± 2.03 10.00 ± 2.39 14.60 ± 3.82 98.851 <0.001
Mean CT value (HU) −631.75 ± 54.38 −594.03 ± 63.87 −516.42 ± 99.32 57.795 <0.001
Maximum CT value (HU) −492.69 ± 135.90 −405.39 ± 152.22 −263.64 ± 169.65 37.344 <0.001
Volume (mm3) 352.56 ± 257.92 588.39 ± 435.76 1807.72 ± 434.42 97.325 0.001

The pairwise comparison showed that the difference in quantitative parameters between two groups was statistically significant (for all, P<0.05 after adjustment by the Bonferroni method).