Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;42(1):BSR20212416. doi: 10.1042/BSR20212416

Table 3. Analysis and comparison of CT signs among different pathological subtypes.

CT signs AAH/AIS (n=55) MIA (n=93) IAC (n=76) χ 2 P-value
Density type 33.199 0.001
 pGGNs 47 (85.45%)1 61 (65.59%)2 28 (36.84%)3
 mGGNs 8 (14.55%)1 32 (34.41%)2 48 (63.16%)3
Shape 23.156 0.001
 Round/oval 40 (72.73%)1 43 (46.24%)2 23 (30.26%)3
 Irregular 15 (27.27%)1 50 (54.76%)2 53 (69.74%)3
Location 8.653 0.371
 Superior lobe of right lung 26 (47.27%) 31 (33.70%) 31 (36.56%)
 Middle lobe of right lung 5 (9.09%) 11 (11.96%) 11 (11.83%)
 Inferior lobe of right lung 7 (12.73%) 14 (15.22%) 13 (13.98%)
 Superior lobe of left lung 12 (21.82%) 23 (25.00%) 23 (24.73%)
 Inferior lobe of left lung 5 (9.09%) 13 (14.13%) 12 (12.90%)
Peripheral signs
 Lobulation 20 (36.36%)1 50 (53.76%)2 71 (93.42%)3 50.287 0.001
 Spiculation 11 (20.00%) 32 (34.41%)2 51 (67.11%)3 32.799 0.001
Internal signs
 Vacuolar sign 12 (21.80%) 28 (30.10%) 32 (42.10%)3 6.323 0.042
 Air bronchogram 11 (20.00%) 27 (29.03%)2 39 (51.32%)3 15.884 0.001
Adjacent structure
 Pleural indentation 2 (3.64%) 12 (12.90%)2 35 (46.05%)3 41.082 0.001
 Vascular convergence 39 (70.91%) 76 (81.72%)2 71 (93.42%)3 11.675 0.003
Tumor–lung interface 0.351 0.839
 Blurred 33 (60.00%) 58 (62.37%) 44 (57.89%)
 Clear 22 (40.00%) 35 (37.63%) 32 (42.11%)

1Indicates a statistically significant difference between AAH/AIS and MIA.

2Indicates a statistically significant difference between MIA and IAC.

3Indicates a statistically significant difference between IAC and AAH/AIS.

Bonferroni method was used for pairwise comparison(for all, P<0.05 after adjustment).