Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 19;11(4):393–410. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.50

Appendix 2. Quality assessment of included articles using the STROBE checklist .

Author;
(year)
STROBE score (Reviewer 1: S.B.M) STROBE score (Reviewer 2: B.V) Mean STROBE score Study quality 1
A. Burdorf
(1993)
16 16 16 Moderate
T. Skov
(1996)
16 16 16 Moderate
R. Gunzburg
(1999)
17 16 16.5 High
P. R.Craft
(1999)
21 18 19.5 High
C. Thorbjornsson
(1999)
19 17 18 High
D. K. Shehab
(2003)
15 12 13.5 Moderate
A. N.Sjolie
(2004)
17 16 16.5 High
V. ­Yip
(2004)
18 19 18.5 High
S. Andrusaitis
(2006)
17 14 15.5 Moderate
V.M. Mattila
(2007)
19 17 18 High
P. Spyropoulos
(2007)
19 19 19 High
J. Auvinen
(2008)
21 19 20 High
A. Karahan
(2008)
20 20 20 High
B. Skoffer
(2008)
17 15 16 Moderate
S. Ahn
(2009)
19 20 19.5 High
F.Tissot
(2009)
19 20 19.5 High
W. Yao
(2012)
20 19 19.5 High
N. Aggarwal
(2013)
19 18 18.5 High
M. Mohseni Bandpei
(2014)
19 18 18.5 High
P.Mikkonen
(2015)
20 17 18.5 High
J. Fernandes
(2015)
18 15 16.5 High
G. Inoue
(2015)
17 17 17 High
N. Gupta
(2015)
22 20 21 High
J. Stricevic
(2015)
15 14 14.5 Moderate
M. Dolphens
(2016)
19 18 18.5 High
S. Hussain
(2016)
21 19 20 High
M. Ardahan
(2016)
19 15 17 High
L. Lunde
(2017)
20 18 19 High
S. ŞIMŞEK
(2017)
17 19 18 High
Y. Yabe
(2017)
21 18 19.5 High
S. Ganesan
(2017)
15 17 16 Moderate
M. Balling
(2017)
21 20 20.5 High
S.Ye
(2017)
17 18 17.5 High
H. Yang
(2016)
17 18 17.5 High
Sh. Sen Sribastav
(2018)
18 19 18.5 High
S.Park
(2018)
21 17 19 High
M. Korshøj
(2018)
21 20 20.5 High
A. Citko
(2018)
18 17 17.5 High
S. Celik
(2018)
16 18 17 High
R. Shiri
(2018)
21 18 19.5 High
S. Kulandaivelan
(2018)
17 17 17 High
C. Tavares
(2018)
18 16 17 High
Q. Zhang
(2019)
18 18 18 High
B. Minghelli
(2019)
15 18 16.5 High
T. Bento
(2019)
20 20 20 High
H. Ayed
(2019)
20 20 20 High
F. Hanna
(2019)
18 19 18.5 High
D. Schwertner
(2019)
18 18 18 High
C. Bontrup
(2019)
16 18 17 High

STROBE: STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology.

1: Mean STROBE score ≥ 16.5 (from two reviewers) was considered as high quality and 11 to 16.5 was considered as moderate quality.