Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;23:36. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02659-6

Table 6.

The association between gustatory dysfunction and nutritional markers

Total cholesterol LDL-cholesterol Grip strength Albumin Protein-Energy malnutrition
Odds ratio p-value* Odds ratio p-value* Odds ratio p-value* Odds ratio p-value* Odds ratio p-value*
Controls (without CKD) Per 10 mg/dl decrease Per 10 mg/dl decrease Per 10 kg decrease Per 1 mg/dl decrease
Model 1 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 0.37 0.99 (0.93, 1.04) 0.68 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) 0.84 0.90 (0.55, 1.47) 0.70 1.05 (0.70, 1.58) 0.81
Model 2 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.32 1.00 (0.93, 1.05) 0.93 0.89 (0.80, 1.01) 0.06 1.19 (0.68, 2.08) 0.53 1.11 (0.62, 1.96) 0.71
CKD (eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)
 Model 1 1.05 (0.99, 1.12) 0.09 1.10 (0.97, 1.23) 0.08 1.06 (0.88, 1.28) 0.38 0.83 (0.21, 3.22) 0.77 2.45 (0.60, 9.94) 0.19
 Model 2 0.96 (0.90, 1.01) 0.10 1.11 0.88, 1.41) 0.10 0.94 (0.61, 1.45) 0.80 1.52 (0.23, 10.00) 0.71 1.91 (0.48, 7.52) 0.33

Model 1 was univariable model

Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, race, educational attainment, marital status, family income to poverty ratio, alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, history of cardiovascular disease, history of cancer and depression

*p-value was calculated by Sidak-Holm technique to adjust for multiple comparisons