Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;10(1):e01682-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01682-21

TABLE 3.

Antimicrobial MIC and susceptibility of Elizabethkingia anophelis strains in Changhua Christian Hospitala

E. anophelis (strains of dominant lineage, n = 226)
E. anophelis (other strains, n = 62)
Characteristics MIC50 (μg/mL) MIC90 (μg/mL) S, n (%) MIC50 (μg/mL) MIC90 (μg/mL) S, n (%)
Amikacin ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0) ≥ 64 ≥ 64 3 (4.8)
Cefepime ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0) ≥ 64 ≥ 64 13 (19.7)
Cefotaxime ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0) ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0)
Ceftazidime ≥ 32 ≥ 32 0 (0) ≥ 32 ≥ 32 0 (0)
Ciprofloxacin ≥ 4 ≥ 4 0 (0) 2 ≥ 4 45 (72.6)b
Colistin ≥ 16 ≥ 16 0 (0) ≥ 16 ≥ 16 0 (0)
Flomoxef ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0) ≥ 64 ≥ 64 0 (0)
Gentamicin ≥ 16 ≥ 16 1 (0.4) ≥ 16 ≥ 16 1 (1.6)
Imipenem ≥ 16 ≥ 16 0 (0) ≥ 16 ≥ 16 0 (0)
Piperacillin-tazobactam ≥ 128/4 ≥ 128/4 0 (0) ≥ 128/4 ≥ 128/4 0 (0)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ≤ 2/38 ≥ 4/76 133 (58.8) ≤ 2/38 ≥ 4/76 36 (58.1)
a

S, susceptible; MIC50, MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested are inhibited; MIC90, MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited; n (%), the number of susceptible isolates and susceptible rates.

b

P <0.05; comparison for the susceptible rates between dominant E. anophelis strains to other E. anophelis strains