Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;17(9):6489–6498. doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3048391

TABLE III. Comparison of Performances With Other State-of-The-Art Networks on COVID Lesion Segmentation on Dataset-2.

Network Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Dice (%) IoU (%)
Unet [16] 75.9Inline graphic 0.34 88.9Inline graphic 0.12 79.3Inline graphic 0.26 74.9Inline graphic 0.18
MultiResUnet [30] 77.2Inline graphic 0.33 90.3Inline graphic 0.24 82.7Inline graphic 0.28 77.4Inline graphic 0.15
Attention-Unet [31] 81.1Inline graphic 0.29 92.2Inline graphic 0.11 85.1Inline graphic 0.14 79.6Inline graphic 0.28
CPF-Net [29] 78.9Inline graphic 0.27 91.7Inline graphic 0.14 84.4Inline graphic 0.25 79.3Inline graphic 0.25
Gated-Unet [32] 81.4Inline graphic 0.24 92.5Inline graphic 0.19 85.6Inline graphic 0.19 80.2Inline graphic 0.16
Inf-Net [12] 82.7Inline graphic 0.26 94.8Inline graphic 0.21 86.9Inline graphic 0.34 81.1Inline graphic 0.18
TA-SegNet (ours) 88.5Inline graphic 0.22 98.9Inline graphic 0.14 90.2Inline graphic 0.17 86.4Inline graphic 0.19