Table 1. Reported AIS cases due to VBAD underwent endovascular reperfusion therapy.
| No. | Age | Sex | Angiographic findings | Aetiology of large vessel occlusion | Endovascular treatment | Outcomes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissection site | Distal artery occlusion | Dissection site | Occluded distal artery | |||||
| 117) | 11 | M | Left V4 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | LIF | mRS 4 |
| 218) | 6 | M | Left V3 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | MT | mRS 0 |
| 319) | 41 | F | Right V4 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | MT | mRS 0 |
| 420) | 1 | M | Left V2–V3 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | MT | mRS 0 |
| 521) | 17 | M | Left V4 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | MT | mRS 1 |
| 61) | 33 | N.A. | BA | – | Local occlusion | MT | – | mRS 2 |
| 71) | 47 | N.A. | Right V4–BA | – | Local occlusion | MT stenting | – | mRS 1 |
| 816) | 59 | F | BA | – | Local occlusion | MT stenting | – | mRS 1 |
| 93) | 64 | M | BA | – | Local occlusion | MT stenting | – | mRS 6 |
| 103) | 47 | F | V4–BA* | – | Local occlusion | Stenting | – | mRS 1 |
| 113) | 51 | M | V4–BA* | – | Local occlusion | Stenting | – | mRS 3 |
| 123) | 49 | M | V4–BA* | – | Local occlusion | MT | – | mRS 1 |
| 133) | 38 | F | BA | – | Local occlusion | MT, stenting | – | mRS 2 |
| 1422) | 37 | F | Bilateral V4 | BA | Tandem occlusion | PTA | MT | mRS 3 |
| 1523) | 64 | M | Right V4 | BA | Tandem occlusion | PTA | MT | mRS 3 |
| 16 (Present case no. 1) | 42 | M | Left V3–V4 | BA | Distal occlusion | – | MT | mRS 0 |
| 17 (Present case no. 2) | 69 | M | Bilateral V4 | – | Local occlusion | Stenting | – | mRS 2 |
| 18 (Present case no. 3) | 41 | M | Left V3 | Left V4 | Tandem occlusion | Stenting | MT | mRS 2 |
* Dissection side was not applicable.
AIS: acute ischaemic stroke, VBAD: vertebrobasilar artery dissection, BA: basilar artery, LIF: local intraarterial fibrinolysis, mRS: modified Rankin Scale, MT: mechanical thrombectomy, M: male, F: female, NA: not applicable, PTA: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.