Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Sci. 2021 Nov 3;431:120046. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120046

Table 2.

Relationship between DNAm estimated plasma proteins and Parkinson’s disease

Model 1: Age, Sex, Ancestry, Smoking Model 2: Age, Sex, Ancestry, Smoking, Cell Comp
Predictor: OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
DNAm CD56 1.41 1.11, 1.79* 1.34 1.05, 1.70*
DNAm EFEMP-1 0.83 0.70, 0.98* 0.80 0.68, 0.95*
DNAm B2M 1.20 1.02, 1.41* 1.14 0.97, 1.34
DNAm TIMP-1 1.23 1.03, 1.46* 1.06 0.88, 1.29
DNAm Cystatin-C 1.19 1.00, 1.42* 1.11 0.93, 1.32
DNAm ADM 1.21 0.99, 1.47 1.13 0.92, 1.38
DNAm PON1 0.90 0.77, 1.05 0.91 0.77, 1.07
DNAm Leptin 0.84 0.62, 1.13 0.89 0.65, 1.20
DNAm PAI-1 0.93 0.80, 1.09 0.93 0.79, 1.09
DNAm GDF-15 1.07 0.90, 1.26 1.04 0.88, 1.23
DNAm Ceruloplasmin 1.16 0.68, 1.99 1.31 0.76, 2.27
DNAm Myoglobin 1.07 0.83, 1.38 1.04 0.81, 1.33
* =

significant associations (p < 0.05)

Each DNAm marker is modeled in a univariate logistic regression with all covariates and the DNAm marker included in the same model. Odds Ratio per 1 SD of DNAm plasma protein levels.