Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 22;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258

Comparison 12. PHYSIOTHERAPY WITH ELECTRO MAGNETIC THERAPY VERSUS PHYSIOTHERAPY WITH NO ELECTRO MAGNETIC THERAPY.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Range of shoulder flexion at 12 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Range of shoulder abduction at 12 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Range of shoulder external rotation at 12 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Range of shoulder internal rotation at 12 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Pain at rest at 12 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Pain on movement at 6 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Pain on lying at 6 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7.1 adhesive capsulitis 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]