Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 22;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258

Berry 1980.

Methods Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind assessors: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Adequate follow‐up: Yes; Intention‐to‐treat analysis: No; Between‐group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes; Eligibility criteria: Yes
Participants 60 outpatients (mean age acupuncture group 52.3; mean age steroid plus placebo 54.1; mean age steroid plus tolmentin 51.2; mean age physiotherapy 55.1; mean age placebo 56.2) (with an uncomplicated rotator‐cuff lesion defined as pain on resisted movements of the shoulder with or without some loss of passive movement, mainly abduction
Interventions Four weeks of: 
 Group 1: Acupuncture for 20 minutes weekly, using classical Chinese acupuncture with moxibustion 
 Group 2: Steroid injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone with 2 ml 2% lignocaine using anterior appraoch to the shoulder joint plus placebo tolmentin (2 tablets 3 times daily) 
 Group 3: Steroid injection plus active tolmetin sodium (a non steroidal anti‐inflamtory drug) (400 mg 3 times daily) 
 Group 4: Physiotherapy of standardised ultrasound for 10 minutes for eight sessions 
 Group 5: Placebo tolmetin plus placebo ultrasound
Outcomes Assessed at start of study and at 2 and 4 weeks on: 
 1. Pain measured by visual analogue scale and 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, servere pain); 2. Active total shoulder abduction using a goniometer; 3. Comparative assessment by patient and assessor (much better, better, same, worse, much worse); 5. Success or failure of the treatment at the end of four weeks, defined as need for steroid injection; 6. Adverse outcomes
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk C ‐ Inadequate