Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 22;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258

Herrera‐Lasso 1993.

Methods Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind assessors: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Adequate follow‐up: Yes; Intention‐to‐treat analysis: No; Between‐group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No; Eligibility criteria: Yes
Participants 30 participants (mean age US 56; mean age TENS 62) with bicipital or supraspinatus tendinitis, subdeltoid bursitis or periarthritis of the shoulder assessed clinically and radiologically
Interventions Group 1: Ultrasound to the glenohumeral joint for 10 minutes, 2‐5 times per week for 13 sessions, starting with 0.5W/cm squared and increasing by 0.1 W/cm squared each session to 1 W/cm squared for all subsequent sessions 
 Group 2: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the anterior and posterior aspects of the joint for 20 minutes for 2‐5 times per week for 13 sessions, with a mean frequency of 50Hz. 
 All patients performed Codman (pendular) and stetching exercises and recieved superficial heat treatment
Outcomes Assessed before and after episode of treatment for: 1. range of movement (flexion and abduction) measured by standard goniomter; 2. pain on visual analogue scale
Notes Able to impute pain data from graph, but not range of motion. Authors contacted in attempt to retrieve range of motion data, awaiting response.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk C ‐ Inadequate