Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 22;2003(2):CD004258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004258

Shehab 2000.

Methods Random allocation: Yes;Concealed allocation: No;Baseline comparability: Yes;Blind assessors: Yes;Blind subjects: No;Blind therapists: No;Adequate follow‐up: No;Intention‐to‐treat analysis: Yes;Between‐group comparisons: Yes;Point estimates & variability: Yes;Eligibility criteria: Yes
Participants 50 female participants with painful shoulder movement of at least 1 month's duration. Diagnosis confirmed with provocative testing
Interventions Both groups treated 3‐5 times a week for 13 sessionsGroup 1: TNS 30 mins 50Hz to anterior and posterior shoulderGroup 2: US 0.5W for 10 mins, increased by 0.1W for each sessionBoth groups had ice and stretching
Outcomes Assessed after 13 visits 1. Pain on VAS2. Flexion and Abduction ROM
Notes Presented medians and ranges hence not included in meta‐analysis but in additional tables
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear