Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 2;23(1):bbab395. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab395

Table 2.

A comparison of prediction accuracies (Inline graphic-values) by sequence length for each method

Length Short (12–150 nt) Medium (151–500 nt) Long (501–4381 nt)
PKF PK CB PKF PK CB PKF PK CB
IPknot
 (LinearPartition-C) 0.681 0.552 0.258 0.492 0.482 0.128 0.433 0.428 0.061
 (LinearPartition-V) 0.669 0.499 0.143 0.478 0.461 0.091 0.380 0.370 0.038
 (CONTRAfold) 0.678 0.550 0.259 0.495 0.505 0.154 0.426 0.413 0.066
 (ViennaRNA) 0.669 0.500 0.144 0.480 0.461 0.091 0.212 0.317 0.041
ThreshKnot
 (LinearPartition-C) 0.681 0.501 0.027 0.493 0.475 0.019 0.439 0.431 0.008
 (LinearPartition-V) 0.669 0.484 0.033 0.481 0.456 0.026 0.383 0.372 0.014
Knotty 0.641 0.550 0.315
SPOT-RNA 0.658 0.621 0.322 0.462 0.479 0.127
CONTRAfold 0.682 0.519 0.000 0.500 0.497 0.000 0.425 0.415 0.000
RNAfold 0.668 0.472 0.000 0.474 0.442 0.000 0.361 0.347 0.000

PKF, Inline graphic-value for pseudoknot-free sequences; PK, Inline graphic-value for pseudoknotted sequences; CB, Inline graphic-value of crossing base pairs.