Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e01659-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01659-21

TABLE 1.

Comparison of different approaches to SARS-CoV-2 genotypinga

Parameter Allele-specific RT-qPCR Targeted/Sanger sequencing WGS
Cost $ $$ $$$ (depends on batch size)
Real-world TAT 0−2 days 2–7 days 3−10 days
Advantages Rapid TAT to impact MAb choice; widely available; easy to define targets Potentially faster TAT than that of WGS; potentially more widely available Outbreak investigation; novel mutation identification; no need to redevelop assay to identify new variants
Disadvantages Limited targets; need for continuous updates to include new variants Limited targets Greater informatics expertise, cost, TAT
a

TAT, turnaround time; MAb, monoclonal antibody. Reagent costs for WGS can be as low as $30 to $40 per sample if sufficient batch size is obtained. Given that none of these tests are highly automated, labor costs comprise a significant proportion of the total cost.