Table 2.
The performance of different side-chain modeling methods on three native backbone test sets measured by all residues
| MAE (χ1) | MAE (χ2) | MAE (χ3) | MAE (χ4) | ACC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMEO (60) | |||||
| FASPR | 29.15 | 42.36 | 57.01 | 57.93 | 49.10% |
| SCWRL4 | 29.01 | 42.88 | 57.25 | 57.17 | 49.48% |
| OSCAR-star | 27.29 | 41.97 | 56.08 | 57.66 | 49.91% |
| OPUS-RotaNN | 33.28 | 42.47 | 57.68 | 51.39 | 37.83% |
| DLPacker | 24.11 | 39.60 | 63.84 | 68.10 | 52.19% |
| OPUS-RotaNN2 | 21.61 | 31.13 | 49.79 | 47.78 | 55.61% |
| OPUS-Rota4 | 21.34 | 31.13 | 49.79 | 47.78 | 57.35% |
| CASPFM (56) | |||||
| FASPR | 26.63 | 39.75 | 53.40 | 54.81 | 53.11% |
| SCWRL4 | 27.09 | 40.44 | 52.67 | 54.61 | 53.17% |
| OSCAR-star | 24.53 | 37.43 | 50.51 | 52.99 | 54.92% |
| OPUS-RotaNN | 29.41 | 38.93 | 53.33 | 49.19 | 42.86% |
| DLPacker | 21.35 | 37.79 | 61.05 | 66.78 | 55.26% |
| OPUS-RotaNN2 | 18.85 | 28.50 | 44.88 | 44.87 | 58.17% |
| OPUS-Rota4 | 18.46 | 28.50 | 44.88 | 44.87 | 60.42% |
| CASP14 (15) | |||||
| FASPR | 35.80 | 48.72 | 56.59 | 45.19 | 36.34% |
| SCWRL4 | 35.27 | 48.13 | 58.37 | 48.15 | 36.57% |
| OSCAR-star | 34.45 | 48.10 | 56.70 | 42.28 | 36.76% |
| OPUS-RotaNN | 39.57 | 45.67 | 53.80 | 39.77 | 27.31% |
| DLPacker | 30.99 | 48.21 | 65.14 | 70.83 | 40.05% |
| OPUS-RotaNN2 | 28.21 | 40.14 | 51.93 | 40.76 | 41.16% |
| OPUS-Rota4 | 28.33 | 40.14 | 51.93 | 40.76 | 43.38% |